Our family tree - Home Page

Our Southall Family Tree

Principal surnames researched :
Croymans, Panalang Batu, Scudds, Southall, Van Den Broek

About Us

With so much information now available, and privacy so important, I have removed password protected tree section with the more detailed descendancy reports, as they contained living descendants.

The new pages will be built without living relatives included to avoid the need for secure areas on the website.

**********************************

Other Family Pages

Croymans tree page more >>

Scudds tree page more >>

Van Den Broek tree page more >>

Welcome to our family tree page.

Please contact us if you feel you may be related, or have further information to add to our tree.

William SOUTHALL married Elizabeth , children

1. Elizabeth chr 15 May 1722 (Pattingham, Staffordshire).

2. Eleanor chr 6 Jun 1725 (Pattingham) married Richard PERRY 28 May 1743 in St Mary, Brewood, Staffordshire

3. Mary chr 4 Jan 1730 (Pattingham)

4. William chr 1 Jan 1735 (Pattingham)

5. John chr 23 Apr 1738 Pattingham, Stafford married Mary LESTER on 5 Aug 1765 in Sedgley, children

5.1 Katharine chr. 5 Mar 1769

5.2 John chr. 25 Dec 1771 – Abt 1773

5.3 John chr. 17 Jan 1773

5.4 William chr. 29 May 1766 married Esther in 1787, children:
5.4.1 Benjamin b. 25 Jan 1788 (Sedgley) – d. 30 May 1866 (Victoria, Aust.) married Elizabeth HORTON on 7 Nov 1809, children:

5.4.1.1 Esther b Abt 1809

5.4.1.2 Martha b 1810

5.4.1.3 Sarah chr 5 Sep 1813

5.4.1.4 Benjamin chr 31 Aug 1817 – d 20 Jan 1822

5.4.1.5 Caroline 21 Mar 1819

5.4.1.6 Thomas Horton b 1821, chr 6 Jan 1822 (Sedgley) – d 1889 ( Victoria ). Thomas Horton and brother William arrived in Geelong , Aust. on the ship Joseph Somes on 24 Sep 1847. The trial court DYB Derby Azzises sentenced the pair to 15 years on 29 Jul 1845. They were convicted of a felony and were granted a conditional pardon on arrival in Australia.

5.4.1.7 Hannah chr 20 Jun 1824
5.4.1.8 William b 21 Jan 1827

5.4.1.9 Enoch b 5 Feb 1829 (Hirnant, Wales ) – 4 Aug 1917 (Ballarat, Aust). Enoch, the youngest brother, appeared to follow the brothers and arrived in Sept. 1857 aboard the General Windham. He was accompanied by his parents, Benjamin and Elizabeth, his wife Sarah JOHNSON, and their children:

5.4.1.1.1 Hannah b 1846 (Warwickshire), (marked as “Not going” on passenger list, suspect she is not the child of Enoch and Sarah)

5.4.1.1.2 Mary Jane b 1849 ( Birmingham )

5.4.1.1.3 Caroline Hannah b 1852 ( Birmingham )

5.4.1.1.4 Sarah b 1852 (Yorkshire)
5.4.1.1.5 Samuel Dowell b 1856 ( Birmingham )

5.4.1.1.6 Bertha Rosalie b 1860 (Aust)

5.4.1.1.7 John Thomas b 1861(Aust)

5.4.1.1.8 Enoch William b 1863 (Aust)

5.4.1.1.9 Amos Henry b 14 Feb 1866 (Aust)

5.4.1.1.10 Alfred Ernest b 1868 (Aust)
5.4.2 John chr 24 Apr 1791 (Sedgley)

5.4.3 Mary chr 9 Dec 1792 (Sedgley)

5.4.4 Ann chr 4 May 1794 (Sedgley)

5.4.5 William chr 1 Nov 1795 (Sedgley)

5.4.6 Hannah chr 10 Dec 1797

5.4.7 Esther chr 21 Dec 1800 – May 1803 (Kingswinford)

5.4.8 George chr 8 May 1803 (Kingswinford)

5.4.9 Grace chr 4 Nov 1804 – Oct 1805 (Kingswinford)

5.4.10 Jane chr 4 Nov 1804 (Kingswinford)

5.4.11 Zachariah chr 19 Oct 1806 (Kingswinford)

5.4.12 Edwin chr 21 Aug 1808 (Kingswinford)
5.5 Sophia chr. 15 Aug 1779

5.6 Benjamin chr. 19 May 1782

5.7 Cornelius chr 30 Jan 1785

Our tree angels
(Our special thanks to the Southall tree angels who have shared their information for the benefit of others) :

Don Guest (Vict.)
des. from Caroline Hannah (1852)

Jodi Fuller (Australia)
des. from Enoch’s son Amos

Helen Bristol
des. from Amos Henry

Ann Dunstan (Australia)

Judy Mellowes (Syd.)
des. from Benjamin (1782)

'Molly' Mary Bergh (nee Murray) (WA)
des. from Edwin

Warren Baines
des. from William Henry

Lisa & Carolyn des. from John Thomas (1861)

Our actual tree contains lots information and like any family tree information it is either provided by someone else, hypothetical guesswork, solid facts, information gained from other researchers, websites etc Our sources, which are not on the tree, tell us what state they are in eg most are waiting for either a direct descendant to confirm or for us to actually site the original sources eg BDM's, census materials etc Most of the information is there because it has come from somewhere, nothing makes it 'more' correct until we have verified the information. As you can imagine this is an endless process that we are constantly working through for all our trees. Therefore please feel free to advise us of corrections and if you have researched yourselves, why you have perhaps chosen one possibility over another.

Genealogy is not an exact science,
but together we can unlock our families of the past.